Harry Krause wrote:
Bert Robbins wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:





I dunno. What is it now - 65%-70% of Americans are none too pleased
with the Bush Administration's conduct of its war against Iraq? While
the Repubs will try to paint Lamont and other Dems who oppose their
war as "weak on defense," I don't believe that dog is going to hunt.
You'd think by now that most voters would be able to differentiate
between a failed foreign policy that has drained our national
security and a reasoned approach to getting out of Iraq that
recognizes that country is heading down the toilet.

The Democrats are weak on defense.


Report back here when you've finished high school, Bertbrain.

I did near 30 years ago.

Do you disagree that the Democrats are weak on defense? The say the have
a better plan, they say the will fight smarter but, they can't put their
better plan into words and the can't describe how to fight smarter. The
reason is that they have no better plan and they don't know tot fight
let alone fight smarter.


The Bush-Republican-Neocon fiasco has done us serious and
long-lasting damage around the world. We have "lost face" everywhere.
Central and South America are turning left. Iran is thumbing its nose
at us every way it can, and because we're bogged down in Iraq, it was
able to get its Hezbollah client to start up serious trouble with
Israel.

We are in the initial stages of WWIII. You can choose to bury your
head in the sand if you want but, this war hasn't even gotten started.


Well, then, son, you ought to re-up. I'm sure the marines could use you
to stop a bullet or an IED.

When are you going to serve your country?