Alotta Fagina wrote:
You wrote:


Bert Robbins wrote:
Harry Krause wrote:
Alotta Fagina wrote:
You wrote:

Half of the North Slope oil production in Alaska is shutting down
today. That is about 8% of the US production.

Story he

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060807/...ield_shutdown_
7

$4 gas just around the corner?!

Yeah, but the envirofreaks claim that opening 7% of ANWR to oil
exploration wouldn't ease prices.

Riiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiight.


You seem to be in contention for official newsgroup horse's
ass...congrats.

Either you want the oil to flow and the prices to go down or you want
to
stem the flow of oil and have the prices go up. I want the former.

What evidence do you have that the price will go down if we drill in
ANWR?

Ummm... didn't today's REDUCTION in supply result in a price INCREASE?

Nevermind... You're really too ****ing stupid to even know the answer that.

Hehe, you call me ****ing stupid, and you can't even realize that you
are talking apples and oranges. ANWR doesn't have a damned thing to do
with what is happening today. Your childish and petty name calling
proves to all that you don't have enough information to carry on a
debate. What about the costs associated with setting up, drilling,
building pipelines, staffing, roads, special drilling platforms for the
tundra, and on and on? Many many futures analysts are saying that
because of difficulties associated with getting the oil out of ANWR,
that it probably wouldn't affect price very much. Look back, how much
did the price per gallon at the pump go down when Prudoe Bay came
online?