"JohnH" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 08:47:53 -0400, Harry Krause
wrote:

JohnH wrote:
On Fri, 04 Aug 2006 08:21:48 -0400, Harry Krause

wrote:



The Caddy STS is a *very* nice car and a bargain for the $$$ even
though
it is not inexpensive. One of my compadres at an investment company has
one - a couple of years old now - and it is a sweet ride. There have
been no reports of male hairdressers driving them. :}

I drove an almost new 'Vette a few days ago. I'm not any more impressed
with these cars than I was 35 years ago. They're just "too too" for my
taste.





My brother, with whom I spent last week, drives a new STS. I was
impressed.
I'm also considering the Acura RL. Decisions, decisions.

I could, honestly, care less about the male hairdressers.
--


Perhaps if you weren't hair challenged, you'd care more :}

Both of those cars are nice if you are planning to take lots of trips on
the interstates and appreciate a comfortable ride. For around town, I
prefer a much smaller, lighter AWD or part-time 4WD SUV. The two cars
you are considering are thirsty dudes.

The wife will retire in Jan '08. We'll probably doing some serious
traveling then. She's not seen much of this country, and I've some
favorite
spots I want to show her - not by air!
--
******************************************
***** Have a Spectacular Day! *****
******************************************

John


I am with you on that. Travel by car also lets you live by *your* schedule
and allows much more flexibility in your travels.