Let's see, on one hand we have a century old news
organization that is respected world wide.


Maxprop wrote:
. . . excluding the USA, apparently.

You mean excluding the small percent of dumb-bells & loonies
who prefer the fantasy-land presented on right-wing
hate-talk radio. After all, the real world is a libby-rull plot!

.... Credibility and the NY Times aren't
generally used in the same sentence these days.


I wouldn't put them at the top of the list. OTOH they are
not in the "paid-for disinformation" business.

Remember, if it weren't for the Times sitting on the story
of Bush's wiretap scandal until after the election, your boy
wouldn't have won. But what have they done for you lately?

DSK