Dave wrote:
In this case and on this topic, yes, I'd say RB has greater credibility than
some junior reporter writing for the Times. (I also have a daughter who is
an occasional correspondent for one of the Times's other papers, so know at
least a bit about how these stories get written and printed.)

Let's see, on one hand we have a century old news
organization that is respected world wide. On the other
hand, we have a pathological liar/internet BS artist.

But wait, the Times is wunna-them dadgum libby-rull traitor
newspapers, iddnit? Well then, case closed. We'll go with
the internet BS artist!

DSK