"Alotta Fagina" wrote in message
...
You wrote:


"Alotta Fagina" wrote in message
...
You wrote:


"Alotta Fagina" wrote in message
...
You wrote:


"Alotta Fagina" wrote in message
...
You wrote:

Send your environmentalists to take a sample of any roadway. With
the spilled oil, antifreeze, etc. I can guarantee that under their
regulations, every roadway in the US should be disposed of as well,

Uh, this IS the goal of environmentalists.

That's silly

As silly as trying to outlaw 5ppb of a "toxin" when the salmon's
natural habitat has 1,000 times that level? Oh, right - that's not
silly, it's sick.

What's silly is that you lump all environmental groups into one
comment. I'll wager that you cannot name 10 such groups and describe
the difference between their goals and approaches.

I'll wager you cannot name ONE such group that has come out against the
proposal.

You're right.

Then you admit that your challenge to "name 10 such groups and describe
the
difference(s among) their goals and approaches" was a straw man.

No it wasn't. It was an attempt to determine whether you could even describe
the difference between groups with vastly different methods, like Greenpeace
and Nature Conservancy, to name two extremes.