JohnH wrote:
On 19 Jun 2006 06:19:31 -0700, "basskisser" wrote:


Harry Krause wrote:
basskisser wrote:
Reginald P. Smithers III wrote:
basskisser wrote:
John Gaquin wrote:
"basskisser" wrote in message
Hmm, are you saying that you DON'T see the connection?? Really??
Really. Please illuminate.
This statement will speak volumns if you think about it.

"Research has naught to do with it, bassie. No reasearch required.
Simply
put, if its got tomato in it - so-called "Manhattan style" - it ain't
clam
chowda. Period"

Now, dance...........

Bassy,
I hope you know I am being serious and am not trying to tweak you, but
has anyone told you you see everything in black or white, which limits
your ability to understand what the person was actually saying, or at
least you seem to in Usenet? It seems you sometimes miss the subtle
tones of humor or sarcasm often expressed in Usenet.

--
Reggie

His first statement was not, and I repeat NOT tongue in cheek, and he
knows it. Only after being shown he was dead wrong, did he start
dancing.



This discussion long again passed into the Who Gives a **** trash can.
Why are you perpetuating it? Why do you care so much about such inanities?

Because I finish what I start. You don't have to read it if you don't
want.

BK, I honestly believe this topic was not worth your *starting* on. Let it
go, and take a joke.
--
John H

John, if you recall, it was a decent topic, covered in many decent ways
until John Gaquin stepped in. Why am I all of a sudden to blame?