NOYB wrote:
... However, the smart money says that time will tell
that Syria did indeed accept a transfer of Saddam's WMD. In fact, don't
be surprised when it's revealed that the "chemicals" that recently made
their way to Jordan via Syria turn out to be VX...a WMD made by Iraq.


You'll believe any fantasy as long as it's from a pro-Bush/Cheney source

thunder wrote:
LOL, again, Syria did not accept WMD from Iraq. It's a red herring,
foisted to explain the lack of WMD in Iraq. Syria's relations with Iraq
were tepid at best.

And previous to the war, Syria was cooperating with US intel and counter
terrorist ops. Why would the Bush administration claim Syria has WMD's
unless it is really desperate to yet again turn a foreign policy success
into failure.

... This administration blew the intelligence on Iraq's
WMD.

No, they didn't. Bush & Cheney were determined to invade Iraq and topple
Saddam before the election, they just didn't mention it in their
campaign speeches & promises. From their point of view, it has been a
big success... lots & lots of money rolling in... and possibly a second term


... As you have difficulty believing this, the final reason Syria would
not accept Iraq's WMD is that it would be unnecessary. Syria's chemical
weapons capability far surpasses Iraq's. It is considered to be the most
advanced in the middle east.

http://cns.miis.edu/research/wmdme/syria.htm

http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/syria/



BTW--did you notice that the noose around Assad's neck is tightening a
little bit each day?


Personally, I think the Likud party should fight their own battles.

They seem to be doing OK. And hey, they're finally giving up some of the
settlements...

DSK