"Don" wrote in message
...


Most presidents give orders to kill people. But the blowjob was in no
way
related to the deaths of anyone. That's the difference. Clinton didn't
use
a
continuously evolving fairy tale to justify a war.

Clinton lied his ass off continuously and ordered the killings of
thousands
during his 2 terms.
There is little difference at all between Clinton and Bush.

As far as being consummate politicians, and therfore liars, no. There is
little difference. As far as keeping certain things secret with regard to
foreign policy or military action, there are similarities, but ALL
presidents have to maintain a certain amount of discretion, or plans simply
won't work right.

However, lying about blowjobs is still the focus of many people who didn't
like Clinton. These people pretend not to understand that Clinton's exploits
in a closet are in no way related to foreign policy. These same people are
quite happy to ignore the fact that every time someone lets the air out of
one of Bush's reasons for going to war, he reaches into his pocket and says
"Wait! I have another one here somewhere...."


BTW: According to the precise wording of the Constitution the current
military action in Iraq is NOT a war.

Do you consider that statement positive or negative? Explain why.