"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
news
"Don" wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
news
"Don" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote
John H wrote in message
*** Quotes from 60 Minutes broadcast, 18APR04. ***

Y'all gotta get your heads together. On the one hand you're
whining
that
there
were no plans, on the other you're whining that Bush gave them
away!

Come on folks. Good gosh, even my totally liberal, but somewhat
intelligent,
brother can't believe the atrociously ridiculous stuff some of
y'all
are
posting.

Fact is, we had absolutely NO business invading Iraq.
And, I can't believe that you totally conservative people buy
everything that the dunce in chief spews. He is a proven liar, yet
you'd walk off a cliff with the other lemmings if he said it was
good
for national security.

Just a few years ago the same thing happened on the other side of
the
aisle
with the smeared blue dress, remember?
Idiocy doesn't choose sides.
People defending lying politicians are displaying their own
character.
Anymore, elections aren't about voting YOUR guy in but rather voting
the
OTHER guy out.



That blue dress killed thousands of people, too, didn't it? You're
right.
It
was "the same thing". :-)

Jethro Klintin ordered the killing of many too, or have you forgotten
already?
The point is, in case it eluded you Doug, is that the lying *******s
revealed their true character with their very first lie.
Blue dress, WMD, what the hell's the diff?
In spite of that, many people (you?) defend them anyway.
The voters get exactly the slaveholder they choose.



Most presidents give orders to kill people. But the blowjob was in no way
related to the deaths of anyone. That's the difference. Clinton didn't use
a
continuously evolving fairy tale to justify a war.

Clinton lied his ass off continuously and ordered the killings of thousands
during his 2 terms.
There is little difference at all between Clinton and Bush.
BTW: According to the precise wording of the Constitution the current
military action in Iraq is NOT a war.