"P. Fritz" paulfritz ATvoyager DOTnet wrote in message
...

"There is perhaps no clearer example of the arbitrary vagaries of
mainstream peer-review and its promotion of non-scientific fads, driven by
political and economic interests

You posted this, so it's safe to assume you believe it. What economic
interests do you think drive this PARTICULAR scientific subject?



Next came the fad of acid-rain

The fad??? The NY State DEC seems to disagree, based on 30+ years' worth of
data on rain and the changes in a myriad of lakes.