Calif Bill wrote:
Maybe in the hard core Republicans of your neighborhood. the only reason he
survived the last election was the Democrats found the almost most
unelectable candidate possible and he still came close to winning.

No, the Democrats chose the candidate that pulled in by far
the most votes during the primaries.

It's called democracy.


... His
popularity has not increase. If he controlled spending, he would have a lot
higher rating.

I guess this is your not-quite-honest way of admitting that
President Bush has done a lousy job? Sort of like the way a
lot of people who obviously voted for him now say that they
didn't?


.... The
Democrats have not put anybody in charge of the DNC with a living brain. If
they were to propose a valid way to control spending, excess government
intrusion in to our lives, and a valid immigration reform they could sweep
the elections.

Uh huh. That all hinges on your definition of "valid." For
somebody who has claimed at times to be a centrist or
moderate Democrat, you seem strangely uninformed, or just
unwilling to give credit, to the Democratic Party for their
positive proposals on these very issues (and more).


... Forget the war in Iraq, most do
not like the way it is being run, but we are stuck there

By whom?

I guess we should just shrug it off.

..... Come up with valid plans, not this crap
like Kerry did last time about he has plans but they are secret until after
the election.


???

One of the things I have learned from this newsgroup is just
exactly how far people will go to justify their extremely
stupid & destructive political postures.

DSK