"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
...
Doug Kanter wrote:
"RCE" wrote in message
...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"RCE" wrote in message
...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"RCE" wrote in message
...
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
Great! The suits who invented the domino theory knew by the late
1960s that it was nonsense, and that's what the entire war was
based on. All presidents are the target of various so-called
scholars and shmexperts. Many of us figured out early on that the
North Vietnamese were not going to burn their way through the
south and invade Australia next. Do you remember this nonsense?

Doug, you are chanting a typical shallow and simplistic post mortem
of a very complex set of circumstances, alliances, and political
commitments that took place over many years, mired also in
corruption. In the end it came down to justifying the continuance of
policies that weren't working or were no longer purposeful.
If you simply believe it was all based on the "domino" theory, then
it was you that was duped.

RCE

Like the other two personal wars, it was based on weak presidents who
succumbed to bad advice, thus demonstrating their complete inability
to manage and think for themselves.

So, as it relates to Vietnam, your list of weak Presidents must
include:

Harry S Truman
Dwight D. Eisenhower
John F. Kenney
Lyndon Johnson
Richard M. Nixon
Gerald Ford

and, then, to make everything "ok"

Jimmy Carter.

RCE

Grow up.

Good grief.

RCE


Bert is attempting to say that because Truman authorized the OSS to poke
around SE Asia as "advisors" after WWII, he's in the same category as
Johnson, who clearly made the largest committment to the Vietnam mistake.
He's saying pretty much the same thing for Eisenhower & Kennedy.

Doug focus, I did not write the above list.



What's the diff? A clone is a clone.