Doug Kanter wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..
Doug Kanter wrote:
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..


Why does it matter? New rules? Nobody can talk about this if they
haven't served?
It has nothing to do with talking, everybody can do that with exception
to those that can't physically talk.

If somebody asks a medical questions and you respond with an answer. Are
they entitled to know if you are medical professional and at what level?

Opinions can have weight and that weight is in direct proportion to the
the education and experience of the person giving the opinion.

Would you let the guy taking his first auto mechanics class rebuild your
car's engine? Do you want your doctor's first surgery to be the one he
performs on you?

As expected, all stupid analogies. This discussion is about the
propriety of certain wars. You do not need military service to discuss
this issue. Be careful about disagreeing with that statement. It's a
trap.
As I stated your opinion has value if it is valued. Your opinions have not
valued because they are not valued by others.



Your president created a war, but served no time in the military. Based on
that, ANYONE is welcome to an opinion about the validity of certain wars.

Your President loathed the military just like you.