Just last night Bush said something like, "We know Saddam had those weapons,
we know because he used them on his own people." True enough. But that was
HOW many years ago? 10? Does that mean he still has them? Does that
mean that the best way to get them (if they are there at all) is to send our
troops in to invade?

Looks like Bush wasn't the only one who was confused??

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the
authority
to use force-- if necessary-- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I
believe
that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands
is a real
and grave threat to our security."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal,
murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a
particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to

miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response
to his
continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass
destruction
.. So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction
is real
..."
- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

How many years later?????