"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

" JimH" jimh_osudad@yahooDOT comREMOVETHIS wrote in message
...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"basskisser" wrote in message
oups.com...

Black Dog wrote:
Doug Kanter wrote:
"Black Dog" wrote in message
news
basskisser wrote:

Black Dog wrote:


I have seen almost NO science about climate change. Even in
journals
like Nature, climatology has become polluted by politics.


Perhaps you should read some!


I get Nature's email alerts and abstracts. I would love to "read
some"
science - if it was there. Like I said - I see no science, just
politics.


I take it you've read everything ever published on the subject.
Right?


Sure, I'm doing my PhD on climate change. No, of course I haven't.
But
what I have read (and I am a geologist by training, so I have read a
few
excruciatingly boring journals on earth-science type topics) contains
mostly bad science and much more bad politics.

such as? Do you really think that, when a single electric generating
plant spews 13 million tons of CO2 into the atmosphere yearly,
compounded by all of the plants in the world, that that can have
nothing but a detrimental affect on the environment???



Can I play "the stupid card" here? Here we go: duh drool "CO2 is a
natural thing. Plants make it. It can't be a bad thing regardless of
quantity".


Ouch!! It looks like you need to do a bit more research on this Doug as
you 'know not what you say'. 'Nuf said as I don't want to embarrass you
any further. ;-)


Bzzzzzzzzzzzzzzt!!!!!!!!!! Next contestant, please.


LMAO!!!! So are you now saying man *is not* the cause of global warming?