Sometimes comfort trumps everything else. There's absolutely nothing you can
do about it.


Shortwave Sportfishing wrote:
That's unfair. Locking out a scientist of the discussion because he
believes differently is the whole issue - not so much what he believes
or doesn't believe.


Nobody "locked a scientist out of the discussion."

If that MIT guy wanted to discuss his scientific
observations which indicate that either global warming is
not happening, or is totally unconnected to man's
activities, that would have been fine. I would have been
quite interested to read them, because I've been asking for
such info a long time.

But he had no scienctific statements to offer at all. That
op-ed piece was a fact-free (actually a fact-contradictory)
screed that would have been right at home on the Rush
Limbaugh show. "Let's pretend liberals are still in charge
and whine about how they're f&^&ing everything up."

The guy even complained about being "intimidated" by Al
Gore, who had to hire a woman to coach him on being an alpha
male!

When you present some science, I'll be glad to read it. When
you (or Bert Robbins, whose posts I alomost never read)
present some BS right-wing blah-blah then you can expect it
to get the reception it deserves.

Regards
Doug King