"Jeff Rigby" wrote in message
...

Yes, scientists disagree. Many of the "claims" from the doom and gloom
global warming club have been debunked in terms that even I can
understand. It makes them seem "unscientific" and ignorant as their claims
would require global temperature increases of 50 degrees for polar ice
melt and their models claim 5 degree increases in 100 years.

There are indications NOW that the polar caps are melting at a faster rate
than we've observed in the past. But, of course, we haven't observed it for
that long.


We are being manipulated by corporations and their henchmen in Washington
on any number of issues.

Right, so you still don't recognize this one? IF Bush had gone along with
the Kyoto treaty the Democrats would have been against it. Maybe not at
first but after it impacted our economy, Bush would have been the short
sighted idiot who believed the French and signed the treaty. Clinton
wouldn't have signed the treaty.


There is a contingent of loudmouth idiots who think anything which impacts
the economy is a bad thing, even if the impact is miniscule. These
neanderthals predict doom & gloom in much the same way as some scientists.
They put forth theories like this: If, in a perfect world, coal burning
power plants were given 2 years to make their smokestacks as clean as is
technologically possible, it would mean immediate financial disaster for the
stockholders, enormous job losses, the collapse of the stock market, and the
plunging of certain Midwestern states into abject poverty.

Obviously, none of this is true.