Tuuk wrote:

Not much of an optimist there harry,,

you should be saying ""Bush strategy saves more lives"""

Have you any idea how many lives have been saved because of the U.S stopping
Saddam's killing? Or is that like opportunity costs for you harry.





"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Two U.S. soldiers killed in chopper attack
Fallujah cease-fire goes in effect

Sunday, April 11, 2004 Posted: 9:24 AM EDT (1324 GMT)


BAGHDAD, Iraq (CNN) -- Two U.S. soldiers were killed Sunday when their
Apache attack helicopter was brought down by unidentified groundfire
west of Baghdad, Brig. Gen. Mark Kimmitt said.

The attack came despite a cease-fire in effect in the region.

The attack on the 1st Cavalry helicopter prompted deployment of a rapid
reaction force, according to the Coalition Press Information Center.

------------------------------------------------------------------





Probably not. There are 10,000 or more dead in our wake, and 600 US
soldiers and also many soldiers from a couple of other countries.

But that's not why Bush said we were going into Iraq. Have you forgotten
the stated reasons? I realize those reasons seemed to change about every
week, so it may be hard for you to recall. Do you remember, say, WMD, or
a definite, direct connection to 9-11?