"Bert Robbins" wrote in message
. ..

You keep making judgments about the appropriateness of vehicles for
people, why? Last time I checked I had the freedom to purchase any
vehicle I want. If I want a big gas sucking pig of a vehicle what
business is it of yours? It is my money?

You keep responding this way. Why? Nobody except you has suggested that
when Ford produces a leaner SUV, you will be unable to buy the original
variety. If you disagree, please provide quotes or other evidence of
where I've said this. I suspect you have problems when I say most people
don't need the truck capabilities, but in fact, it is true.

This country is not based upon needs, it is based upon wants and desires.


Have you ever known anyone for whom an SUV seemed all wrong, and asked them
why they bought one? I have. Their wants and desires are simple, usually:
They want a boxy vehicle that's higher off the ground because they feel it's
safer in collisions. It probably is. And, they want more luggage space. Not
seating. Luggage space. (Uncovered luggage is actually dangerous, but never
mind that for the moment.

These people do not fantasize about driving over rocks and through streams,
like you see in the commercials. They would not know the difference between
a 4WD 8-cylinder SUV and a 2WD 6 cylinder model. They just want their boxy
up-off-the-ground car. They can have that wish, in a vehicle that uses less
fuel.

As far as needs, an awful lot of people are apparently realizing that SUVs
did not meet their needs, and in return for this disappointment they were
paying outrageous fuel bills. Around here, they're lined up by the dozens at
used car lots. A buddy of mine works for one of the larger Chevy dealers
here. He says these SUVs are not lease returns - they're mostly trades for
smaller cars.

Apparently, the public is more able to make good decisions than you give
them credit for.