"Jim" wrote in message
...


NOYB wrote:
"bb" wrote in message
...

On Fri, 02 Apr 2004 19:23:11 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:



308k-72k=236,000

-3,000,000 + 236,000 = -2,764,000



Bull**** numbers...even if you use the flawed Payroll Survey data.

First 32 months of Bush's Presidency=-2.546 million jobs
Last 7 months=+759,000 jobs

So you're only off by about 1 million jobs. The economy needs to
average a
gain of 223,375 jobs per month (plus 1) from here on out for Bush's
Presidency to show a net gain in jobs. Then what will your argument be?




Seehttp://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/ap/20040403/ap_on_bi_go_ec
_fi/economy&cid=668&ncid=716

Extract
The average monthly gain in jobs in the past eight months
has been about 95,000 — far below the 150,000 to 200,000
jobs needed to absorb new entrants into the labor force,
Sohn said. Like last month, the unemployment rate could rise
in coming months as workers decide to resume their job
searches.

You Dem's are pretty confused. Last month, you guys were telling me that
the Unemployment Rate (since it is based off of the Household Survey Data)
is meaningless and unreliable. Now, you're telling me that the net gain of
308,000 in the employment numbers (based on the Payroll Survey Data) is
meaningless.

Maybe you guys should all get your heads together, get your stories
straight, and actually come up with some issues that don't require massive
spin and lies to resonate positively with the American people.