In article . net,
Maxprop wrote:

OzOne wrote in message ...

Jesus Max, can you explain why there were no attacks on US soil before
WTC?
There was no HS then1?

I thought we covered this already. The WTC *was* attacked several years
prior 2001. And planes were hijacked periodically throughout the period
from the 1960s on.

We know, Max. We know. And guess what? We all knew it back in the
1960's. If the 9/11 terrorists hadn't been able to get into the
cockpits and take control of the planes, the most they'd have been able
to do is kill a few pax by cutting their throats. It was lack of
physical security of the cockpits that led to 9/11.

There have been no hijackings since. Can you explain
that?

Ah. I see you logic. Post hoc, ergo propter hoc, if I remember my
Latin.


Maybe they're just a little busy recruiting,
Maybe they're just bringing in tiny bits of dirty bombs in containers,
Heck, maybe they're brining in weapons grade uranium concealed INSIDE
the bodies of sacrificial couriers.....
Smoke and mirrors Max...if they want to get around it they will.

Maybe you are jousting at windmills. Maybe al Qaeda has been frustrated by
our security measures since 9/11.

You think so?

http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/01/31/illegal.immigration/

Lessee, how many people did the 9/11 attack? What percentage of illegal
immigrants since 9/11 is that?

Maybe they don't have the funding, or
can't control the funding, thanks to the watchdogs in every bank in every
country throughout the free world.

Personally I agree with you--they will accomplish something in the future.
But that's just an opinion, unsupported by evidence. And so is yours.

And mine. I think they should be hunted down and assassinated,
personally. I sincerely hope that's happening, that they're so busy
looking over their shoulders that their time for plotting aggressive
action is very limited.

PDW