"RCE" wrote in message
...

wrote in message
oups.com...


Nations form when people have common bonds of language, religion,
tradition, and other values. Trying to make a nation from three groups
like the Sunnis, Shiites, and Kurds is like pouring crankcase oil,
water, and honey into a gallon jug and then wondering why it doesn't
all blend together nicely. The Brits probably thought, "Hell, nobody
lives out there but a bunch of sand people anyway- so let's just lump a
big area together, give it a name, and make it easier to administer."

According to Churchill's grandson, his grandfather favored the creation of
"Kurdistan". It was the rest of the British parliament that opposed the
creation of Kurdistan.

I have to wonder what effect that would have had on the region over the past
eight or nine decades.



The only reason it hadn't fallen apart in the last 20 years is that
Saddam insisted on a secular government and also scared the crap out of
all sides. The US has allowed the people to vote in a constitution that
is at least semi-religious, and we can't scare the crap out of
*anybody* without playing into the propaganda program of the religious
fanatics.... we're in a tough spot. We should have looked at a bigger
picture before invading this place, but now that we're there it's
obvious that *nobody* has a good solution for resolving matters and
getting out. Too bad.

So in other words, we're back to where things were early 19th century...and
Bush is in the position to play Churchill's role all over again. Maybe this
time he'll do it right and carve the country up into three separate regions.