No, I think you just learned it. I have been using it long ago.

Hey, dummy white, I just heard a John Kerry advertisement, he said "George
Bush says sending jobs overseas makes sense". Now, did George Bush actually
say that?
In reality, GWB and America is in a reactive position here, this job
migration situation is a result of the high priced lazy union labor here in
the west. I will repeat, this job migration situation is a direct result of
the high priced lazy union labor here in the west. And with globalization
(did GWB create that also) we have available to use resources globally. So,
I can understand any economists making the statement that utilizing
economical labor globally is beneficial for future survival as a nation, but
did GWB actually say that?
Kerry just doesn't make economical sense. With jobs on the rise under Bush
and Kerry making statements he doesn't understand, how does he stand a
chance.

And how is it GWB's fault that these jobs are going overseas? Because he
isn't stopping them? The market decides. What is the matter with you people?
That would be a certain economic collapse should the president either stop
the job migration or offer high tax rebates for employers to keep jobs in
America. You lefties just do not have economic knowledge to even consider or
understand what you are saying.

You morons should have went with Hillary, then you would still have the
ignorant votes, those who hate Bush because of his looks or heroic efforts
in Iraq, and you will have all the women votes who would easily follow
Hillary.




"Don White" wrote in message
...

Tuuk wrote in message
...
He forgot to add OT like you do there Harry. Post resembles the level of
intelligence or value added similar to yours do.



Tuuk has learned a new term... 'value added'
Don't wear it out!