"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
RCE wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
What the music industry needs is a copyright pricing structure that
fairly compensates the actual producers of music AND doesn't rip off
consumers of that product...and they don't have it yet.

One of the reasons midi sequencers like myself stopped sharing some files
on the 'net is because of the threat of lawsuits. Actually, not threats,
but real litigation in some cases that shut down most sites that featured
midi files. Midi files are not music recordings like mp3s or .wav files.
They are a series of instructions to a sound board, card or instrument
that can receive midi instructions. The sound card or instrument then
plays the sequence using it's own, on board voices.

Royalty collectors like ASCAP and BMI quickly (and perhaps correctly,
depending on your personal feelings on the subject) started to threaten
web site owners that had midi files of popular music considered to be
subject to copyright protection. Even though it was not technically a
recording or performance by a musician, the fact that someone sequenced a
series of instructions for a midi compatible instrument to reproduce,
they claimed copyright infringement. Original, copyright free
compositions are encouraged of course and often stolen as a basis for new
music by songwriters in the industry.

RCE





Sheesh.

Well, most of the music I like was written by guys who have been dead for
more than 100 years, so I assume any MIDI sequencers who code it are
beyond the reach of the ASCAP liars, er, lawyers.

My understanding, based on really limited info, is that iTunes forks over
70 cents of each 99 cents collected, to the "owner" of the tune. That's
waaaaay too high. A dime is more like it, with a nickel on top of that for
administration, and a nickel on top of that for Apple's profit...twenty to
twenty-five cents a tune is sufficient.


What a silly thing to say. How do you know what's "way too high"? Based on
what?