"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
. ..
The National Geo photog I occasionally hire uses Nikons with polaroid
backs for setups, and 35 mm and 2-1/4 for money shots. Two of the three
Black Star photogs I hire use kodachrome almost exclusively. There are
reasons why the best shots are still taken with kodachrome or fujichrome
for magazine use.

There's a blast from the past. I know nothing about photography but back
as a teenager I bought a halfway decent camera to try to learn. I
remember trying kodachrome film for slides and was immediately impressed
with the rich, almost artificial colors.

Eisboch


The problem with digital "photos" is that it is hard for a graphics artist
to see precisely what the picture really has, because the monitors
available today won't resolve them. That's not the case with a 'chrome and
a loupe.

Friend that does photography for most of the Silicon Valley annual reports.
Has not used film is at least 3 years. But almost all his digital cameras
all use at least 100+ mbyte per shot. All the commercial stuff cameras
connect to a PC.