Thread
:
( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
View Single Post
#
35
basskisser
Posts: n/a
( OT ) Follow the "Leader"
John H wrote in message . ..
On 23 Mar 2004 05:03:50 -0800,
(basskisser) wrote:
John H wrote in message . ..
On 22 Mar 2004 12:10:30 -0800,
(basskisser) wrote:
John H wrote in message . ..
On 20 Mar 2004 10:59:06 -0800,
(basskisser) wrote:
"Calif Bill" wrote in message hlink.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
thlink.net...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Calif Bill" wrote in message
news:jpH5c.43135
And if I am senile, then I have an excuse.
Bill
Oh, now I don't know whether you are senile or not, I was just giving
you credit, because if it's not senility, then there are only worse
reasons for your wild, unfounded allegations, mood swings, and your
dillusional idea that you can do anything you choose in this
newsgroup, all the while chastising others for doing the same things.
If you are not senile, then it must be you are just stupid.
Do you not think that a person who makes wild, unfounded allegations,
without any bases of fact, has mood swings, and is dillusional has a
mental problem?
Yes you do.
Please show where I've made any wild, unfounded allegations and
assumptions about others.
How about this one:
************************************************
On 20 Mar 2004 10:53:56 -0800,
(basskisser) wrote:
John H wrote in message . ..
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004 14:45:35 GMT, "Don White"
wrote:
Charles wrote in message
...
You think krause beyond self greed and wants the betterment of his
fellow citizens?
If you think so, you're a dolt.
-- Charlie
Unless you have first hand knowledge, all you can judge people on in this
group is what they write.
You have to give people the benefit of the doubt.
On the other hand I wouldn't bet my pension cheque on much I read here. Too
many people trolling just to agitate
others.
I've met him.
John H
So, you think that because you've "met him", that you know all about
him, and can therefore judge him???? That's pretty shallow.
************************************************** ***************************
Would you not call that a wild unfounded allegation and assumption
about what I do or don't know?
John H
IF I had said anything about what you do, or do not know, then yes,
that would be an allegation and assumption. The FACT is, YOU stated
that you could judge him, because you've met him. I said you were
quite shallow for making that statement. No assumptions. If you think
that you can just willy-nilly judge people, you ARE shallow.
You said, "...you know all about him..."
I said, "I've met him." I said nothing more than that. You added all
the bull****.
John H
So, you DO think it wise to judge someone without knowing them?
Did I say that, or are you answering your own questions?
John H
Yes, you did. Can't follow what you've written? It was written to you,
that all you can judge people on here is what they write. It was
further stated that you have to, because of this, give them the
benefit of the doubt. YOU said, "I've met him", alluding to the fact
that, because you've met him, you can judge him, correct? If not, why
would you have made that statement in reference to JUDGING someone?
Reply With Quote