|
|
|
|
A devastating attack on the Bush Administration...
(Backyard Renegade) wrote in message
Fact: Clark testified in congress just about the opposite of what he
says now.
Please give some examples of the above.
Fact: Saddam was paying homicide pig dogs in Isreal and Palistine.
So? Is there a specific point to the above?
Fact: We went to Afganistan, Horn of Africa, the Phillipines, and a
couple of other spots chasing AlQueda long before we went to Iraq.
Yes, but did Bush tell us we needed to go to war with Iraq because of
AlQueda and WMDS?
Fact: The majority of those saying there are no wmd in Iraq, are also
fundamentally opposed to the war and the Bush administration.
That's odd. Show us those WMD's and we'll probably believe it! Funny,
but even Bush is saying there are none now. Is HE opposed to the war,
and himself?
Fact: The UN, especially France, Germany, and Russia were making
billions (with a B) as well as the possibility (at least as beleivable
as these new timely attacks on Bush) of Annon and his own family
members being involved in "possibly the biggest scam in world
history"...There was no way they were ever going to approve a move
into Iraq. This is coming from the USGAO, not some political shill,
biding for a job in a new administration and trying to sell a book.
Proof, please.
|