thunder wrote in message ...
On Mon, 22 Mar 2004 01:43:17 +0000, NOYB wrote:

It's pure partisan politics. Clarke doesn't agree with going after the
countries that sponsor terrorists. Instead, he advocates the laughable
idea of punishing terrorists in our criminal courts.

You may think his book and interview will make a difference. I'm telling
you that 95% of Americans, if asked about him in a month, will say they
never even heard of the guy.

Maybe, but in another month there will be another messenger with the same
message. Iraq wasn't about WMD or terrorism.


Fact: Clark testified in congress just about the opposite of what he
says now.
Fact: Saddam was paying homicide pig dogs in Isreal and Palistine.
Fact: We went to Afganistan, Horn of Africa, the Phillipines, and a
couple of other spots chasing AlQueda long before we went to Iraq.
Fact: The majority of those saying there are no wmd in Iraq, are also
fundamentally opposed to the war and the Bush administration.
Fact: The UN, especially France, Germany, and Russia were making
billions (with a B) as well as the possibility (at least as beleivable
as these new timely attacks on Bush) of Annon and his own family
members being involved in "possibly the biggest scam in world
history"...There was no way they were ever going to approve a move
into Iraq. This is coming from the USGAO, not some political shill,
biding for a job in a new administration and trying to sell a book.

Why are these facts so hard to see, could you be blinded by political
agenda? You will dismiss these facts, congressional testimony, and the
reports of the GAO, but beleive Clark, Moore, Kennedy, and the rest of
the fat entertainers as they push admitted political agendas? Wow,
talk about simple...