On Thu, 22 Dec 2005 01:36:10 GMT, Gene Kearns
wrote:


By your own admission, you only take this thing out once or twice a
year..

You're beginning to sound like Krause...I said I only took it out a
few times that summer.

so oil properties and changes are probably pretty fuzzy for
you, so I'll help you out.

I'm waiting...

First of all 1% would blast past you faster than you could ever see...

Whatever that means.

you couldn't possibly see oil pressure at 1% unless you somehow
limited RPM such as on a compressor wash... so, we must discount that
part of your post.... as not reasonable or verifiable...

Speaking for the group Gene? *You* can discount it all you want, but
the facts remain...there *is* "measurable" oil pressure at 1%.

As usual, it seems I must help further your education.....

LOL! You have yet to "educate" me on anything you have ever posted
here.

http://193.113.209.166/aeroshell/aeroshellteos.pdf

And that proved nothing about your claims, in fact, its supports my
position more than yours...nice try tho...

Your debating tactics are looking more and more like Krause's
fabrications. Inserting words that weren't there, bait-n-switching the
issue, cut-n-pasting from the internet...all in a feeble, but failed
attempt, to back pedal.

1. Pressurized galley babbitt bearing systems (as found in auto/boat
engines) will wear excessively with no oil pressure.

2. Turbines do not "run forever between oil changes".

3. There is indeed measurable oil pressure in my turbine at 1%.

4. You have never educated me about anything. Anything you have ever
said here, I have already known.

The above are facts Gene. I'm sorry if the truth hurts...maybe you
should stick to taking pictures of the back-side of teenage girls in
the woods, attaching your inappropriate comments to them, then posting
them on the internet.

Take care Gene, and happy holidays.
__

"It's just about going fast...that's all..."

http://home.columbus.rr.com/ckg/