"Gould 0738" wrote in message
...
The BLS links I provided at the bottom of that post certainly did. Did you
miss that?

I seldom follow links provided in a post unless the only message is "check this
link." Beyond that, I expect that most of the important facts have been
presented in the main body of the argument.
No, I didn't follow the link.


Put whatever spin you want on it but I stand by my previous statement and the
facts I
presented.



I don't think anybody is disputing your facts. Just the interpretation.


I see you use the disclaimer *recent* when looking at history. Interesting.

What happens tomorrow is probably going to be a whole lot more like what
happened last week or last year than what happened
50, 100, or 1000 years ago. Yeah.


Interesting. Too bad you cannot remain consistent though.

You see, when I asked you in another thread to post examples of how unions have
recently improved the lives of their members you lectured me with their great deeds in
the early to mid 20th century, entirely dismissing the importance of the *recent* past
(yesterday,

Now in this argument you dismiss the past and rely only on last year, tomorrow and
yesterday (the recent past).

Whatever works best for you at any given moment I guess. ;-)