"RkyMtnHootOwl" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 09:32:28 -0500, KMAN wrote:

"RkyMtnHootOwl" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 17:50:24 -0500, KMAN wrote:

snip

Am I a Liberal or a liberal?

You tell me.

I have no idea. It is your label.

Whichever it is, how is it defined, and how did you determine that I am a
fit?

Or is this just another of your baseless smears?

So now you believe that sex is deviant

What are you talking about?

and being called a liberal, is
a smear ??? Hmmm, this is getting good!

Labelling someone is a form of smear. Whether I mind the label or not. The
fact that you refuse - yet again - to explain yourself, is just part of the
reason it is fair to label you as a scumbag.

snip

What's clear is that your whining about lack of serious discussion
demonstrates the highest levels of hypocrisy.


And your constant blather about the "a" word, constitutes serious
intellectual conversation??? Hoot! Make up your mind, do you want
serious conversation, or blather?

You were the one who was whining about it. You have to power to control
yourself, so if being serious is important to you, then you can be serious.

snip

How would you feel about someone smearing you if your non-wife female
companion died?

see the continuation of my statement immediately following!

So you would not feel comfortable paddling with a non-wife female unless
your wife were on hand? Wow, how pathetic! Your relationship must be very
weak???

my wife would be very close at hand. That way
I would not have to worry about any potential conflict of interest or
resulting smear campaign! How about you?

There's is nothing that can be done about idiots like yourself who would
smear someone just to get their jollies. I would not refuse to go
paddling
with a non-wife female just because scum like you might choose to engage
in
a smear campaign.

Your choice! I did not say anywhere that I got any jollies from this
tradgedy, if anything, I have tried to be discrete, whereas you wanted
to go into all the graphic detail that we could dig up

There's no "we" and since no one else was making any suggestions about these
people's off-water activities whatsoever, you are the only scumbag to blame.

just so you
could say you had all the facts. I maintain that all the facts are not
necessary for us to understand that some bad decisions were being
made, and we can speculate as to why that is the case.

I am speculating right now that you are smacking yourself in the head,
because your statement is so stupid.

snip

Let's try again.

No thank you!

Are you saying it is a fact that the two individuals actually did
anything
wrong? Anything includes anything.

The "appearance of possible impropriety" does not count as "doing
something
wrong."

Wrong, but this is obviously where our opinions differ!

So...trying again.

You are saying that it is wrong to do something that someone else might
speculate is improper?

In that case, you are doing something wrong, Tinkernhootowl, because I am
speculating that your smear of these two people is improper!

snip

The fact that the military takes certain things seriously (generally
unimportant things, whereas big things - like invading other countries
and
blowing people up - are taken lightly) really has nothing to do with your
smear campaign. The military isn't smearing these people - you are!

Wrong, but this is obviously where our opinions differ!

If I am wrong, please be specific. I said the military is not smearing these
people. If they are, please point me to the evidence.

snip

He was in a compromising situation as soon as he was alone with her

They were with a guide, as I recall.

People run naked in a sports areana, with 80,000 fans and TV audience
watching. Doesn't stop them from doing stupid things. I doubt that one
guide really mattered to them if they were distracted with other
interest!

You have no evidence to indicate that other interest (whatever that means)
was a factor.

And are you saying that no male who is in the military can be alone with
a
female who is in the military?

Not if one is an officer and other enlisted, and/or one or both are
married, but not to each other. Then these are grounds to be very
careful about any appearance of impropriety!

Please point me to the relevant regulations where this is stated.

If you are saying that, please point us to the relevant policy document.

Uniform Rules of Military Conduct, I believe is what it is called.

Please quote the relevant section.

and though there may not have had anything going on between them, it
put them in jeopardy!

Only in the sense that a scum like yourself might choose to smear them.

There is lots of scum in the world, that is why it is important not to
give them any cause to make any slanderous comments based on nothing
more than the appearance of impropriety.

Those who want to smear will always be able to do so, since the possibility
of the appearance of impropriety is entirely subjective, since it is not
necessary to prove anything to make the smear.

snip
Wrong, but this is obviously where our opinions differ!
Moving On!!!

snip

To choose to speculate that they were doing something wrong (other than
not
wearing PFDs) is a rather scummy thing to do.

Granted, it is a scummy thing to do, but it happens all the time in
the world in which we live

Only when scum like you do it.

hence the importance of not putting
yourself in a compromising situation.

Why would you live your life in fear of scum?

I'm not sure why you feel
compelled to do so, or to think it appropriate or even relevant. I
believe
you mentioned that you yourself sometimes go out on the water without a
PFD.
Does that mean you must be having sex with young boys or something!?!?

In this day and age, I do not believe it is very smart for a man to be
with children by himself. With the rash of older women, young boy
assaults occurring, it is becoming equally advisable that women be
very careful as well. False accusations can be easily lodged, so the
easiest thing is to avoid possible conflicts of interest.

Getting back to what I said, please try again:

I'm not sure why you feel
compelled to do so, or to think it appropriate or even relevant. I
believe
you mentioned that you yourself sometimes go out on the water without a
PFD.
Does that mean you must be having sex with young boys or something!?!?

snip

Clowns know no humilation, we just paint on a bigger silly ass grin!

OK, so your whining about wanting serious conversation was just more of
your
assclown act then? This is fine. You are just here to clown around, and
have
no interest in serious discussion. It all makes sense now. I didn't think
it
was possible for someone to be so idiotic as a matter of everyday
practice.

If you must whine, keep it to yourself!

Good self-talk, Tinkernhootowl!

snip

Typical liberal, hates the military! hates what is important to the
military, you know like spit and polish, and blowing up things! Not
only hates, but beyond their comprehension!

Um. Where is the hatred of the military? My comment is there to indicate
that I see no relevance in that windbag paragraph to what is being
discussed.

Like I said, beyond their comprehension!

Beyond YOUR comprehension.

snip

I like to kiss my wife whenever!

Good grief.

No that would be if I had to kiss your wife!!!

She would, I am quite certain, bash your skull. She suffers assclown
fools
like you much less gladly than I.

Like I said, that would be good grief!

snip

Be sure and call your Congressman! Wait, you're a Canadian, you don't
have a Congressman to call, sorry about that! I guess you could call
your PM, whoever that is this week!

I see you are as uninformed about politics as you are about everything
else.

Prime Minister is to President as Member of Paliament is to Congressman.

Welcome to international politics!

Right, or is it Left! I guess you could have your PM call one of our
Congressmen! By the way, who is your PM this week?

Same one as last week.

snip


How interesting that an asshole like yourself has a toilet obsession.

and, How interesting that you have an obsession with assholes!

Well, I'm talking to one, that is true.

snip


Crack addicts dying on the streets of Amercia often have a smile on their
face. You seem addicted to being an asshole, maybe there's a similar
affect.

And Liberals freezing to death on the streets of Canaada

Liberals (you do not that Liberal and liberal are different thigs, right)
seldom freeze, they tend to have well-lined pockets.

often have
smile on their face, as long as they have their "Popcorn and Beer"!

Uhoh, Tinkernhootowl is getting involved in yet another issue where he
doesn't have a clue.