On Thu, 15 Dec 2005 14:54:53 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

Wm Shakespeare Smithers wrote:
Ok. Is that you story and you are sticking to it?


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Wm Shakespeare Smithers wrote:
JohnH,

I was curious about Harry's real life persona. I have an image in my
head and I was wondering if it was accurate, but it still is not a big
deal.

My guess is Harry wanted to know my name, and once he had that info he
would not have meet for lunch. In the past, he has always found an
excuse not to meet up with someone.

Oh, I would have been there, but there is no chance you would have.
I have no interest in the details of your sorry life beyond your name.
Everything else I care to know about you I already know, from your
behavior here.

The lunch would have given me the opportunity to see if you are as big a
horse's ass in person as you are in this newsgroup, that's all.

But you didn't even have the balls to meet for lunch.



--
Named al Qaeda Recruiter of the Year: George W. Bush




What, that you didn't have the balls to show up for lunch?

You're the one who backed out when I insisted on knowing the
first and last name of the person who wanted to meet me.

Meeting someone "by appointment" whose name I don't know is NOT
some

thing I would do under any circumstances. I wasn't into computer
dating when it was "the" thing to do, and I'm not into it now.

Frankly, your reluctance makes me wonder whether you are a peculiar sort
of sexual predator who has the hots for older, balding men.

More likely, though, it is just another manifestation of your cowardice.

And we already know you are a coward.

Harry, does someone have to be especially courageous to meet you for lunch? Do you bring all your
guns?

Do you ever have lunch with females, or must all your lunch dates have 'the balls to show up'?
--
John Herring

Hope your Christmas is Spectacular!
....and your New Year even Better!