|
posted to rec.boats
|
|
|
How 'bout it Krause?
"John H." wrote in message
...
On 14 Dec 2005 09:16:40 -0800, wrote:
JimH wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
JimH wrote:
wrote in message
oups.com...
William Bruce wrote:
Hey Krause, my offer stands: Prove to the "reasonable man"
standard
that
(1) you have a degree from Yale, (2) your wife is a medical
doctor,
and
(3)
that you own a lobster boat and I'll overnight a $10,000.00 check
to
the
charity of your choice in your name.
How 'bout it?
William
(The first step in creating a contract is identifying the parties
involved. Since nobody knows who you are, you might as well promise
$10,000,000.00. It would be equally meaningless. Making conditional
promises about things you will do "if" is ridiculous when
you cannot be held accountable)
An observation from a guy who has no interest in "defending Harry,"
(Harry can take care of himself, and does, very adequately.):
Aren't at least a few of the folks in the current pig piles on
Harry
and Basskisser supposed to be getting spiritually prepared for what
a
recently touted book declares the "most sacred Christian holiday"
of
the year?
Will these personal attack threads continue until midnight of the
24th?
Kevin gets what he deserves Chuck. His posts contain vulgar language
and
one or more of the following: idiot, nitwit, dolt, ignorant,
dumb...and
so
on.
Here is a list over the past days:
There is no defense for some of the behaviors and statements you
outline.
Actually there is no excuse for any of the behaviors and statements I
outlined.
That's not the point.
It was my point however. And until Kevin cleans up his act he will
continue to be a target.
Take your sermon over to the other side of the fence Chuck. There is
plenty
more cleaning up that is needed there than on the right and sunny side
of
the fence. ;-)
Funny, I didn't think my remarks were aimed toward only a single side
of the fence.
I still maintain that anybody, conservative, liberal, moderate, or what
-not, who would presume to demand that other people behave in a certain
manner during a certain season in order to demonstrate "respect" for
his/her religious belief would be more convincing in those demands if
he or she also behaved in a manner that demonstrated a respect for the
same belief. I'm not sure why you felt that wouldn't apply to
everybody, but it does. (Those who feel that my comments couldn't
possibly apply to them will take no offense).
Not to intrude, Chuck, but you *did* say, "...Aren't at least a few of the
folks in the current pig
piles on Harry and Basskisser..."
Were those remarks aimed at 'both' sides of the fence? I saw nothing
directed at the 'piling' on
Smithers.
Chuck never scolds the left his remarks are written such that he describes
what the right is doing and then says "Can't we all just get along?"
|