JohnH,
Harry has given up his charade about having me filtered, but he still feels
it is safer to respond 2nd hand to all of my posts. Considering Harry's
limited capacity, I can understand why he does.


"John H." wrote in message
...
On Mon, 12 Dec 2005 06:10:38 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 20:18:58 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Wayne.B wrote:
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 19:34:19 -0500, "Lord Reginald Smithers" The
fastest and most accurate Gun in the World wrote:

Harry,
I really don't care if I "engage you" or not.
===================================

If you change your mind, please be sure to invite all of us to the
party.

Hopefully there will be no offspring fron this union.

You have to wonder about Smithers. If he posts 20 times a day here,
typically 15 of those posts are either about me or aimed in my
direction
to see if he can provoke some sort of direct response. Yet, no matter
what he does or says, he gets no response.

He's more than a tad obsessed with me, I suppose. Does that make him
the
"Son of Tuuk"?

Was not this post of yours written in response to Reggie?
--
John Herring



No, John, it is a response to Wayne.

So, if you hadn't been reading any of Smither's posts you would have
written the same thing to
Wayne?

(Surely this isn't going right over your head?)
--
John Herring

Hope your Christmas is Spectacular,
and your New Year even Better!