Harry,
I can see why you don't allow your posts to be archived. it does make it
easier for you to change your story.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Bert Robbins wrote:
Just like his buddy Carl Rowen, the now deceased pundit, that was
vocally anti-gun. But, when those kids came around late in the evening
to swim in his pool the first thing he did was to pull out his
illegally owned gun and started to shoot rather than call the police.

Harry is no different in that he belives that the rules and laws do not
apply to him.


"Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my
manor. wrote in message ...
LOL, this is so funny watching Harry being a supporter of using
handguns for self defense.



Sorry, Bertbrain and buddy, but:

1. I don't own any illegal weapons, or even weapons I illegally
obtained.
2. I don't advocate using handguns for home defense.
3. I don't carry firearms on my person when I leave my home.
4. I shoot *rented* handguns at ranges, and the handguns of friends
on their private property.

If, however, you insist on using a handgun for home defense, then, yes,
I think a semi-auto is a better choice.






So, what you have posited is just more simple-minded, right-wing idiocy.

Wrong, you have said numerous times that you will shoot first and ask
questions later if some of the righties appear at your door.

Sorry, one-volt brain, but what I said was that if Tuuk forced his way
into my house uninvited, I would view that as a home invasion, as he had
publicly threatened to do me harm, and I would act accordingly. That's
not "some" of the righties, that's a particular rightie. And it's no
different than I would treat any other home invader.

You and several of your buddies here should really visit the wizard and
trade in that straw between your ears.

--
God bless our troops; God forgive George W. Bush.