"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
" *JimH*" wrote in message
. ..
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:

Really, Jim, do the test,
show your wife all of your posts to me, the ones where you claim
to
have knowledge that my mother used drugs (still waiting for you
to find
where I ever said anything remotely like that), show her the
posts of
you lying lie after lie about me, for weeks. Show her where
you've
posted questions to me in a manner that would tend to make
someone
think that you had some evidence of certain behaviors, then show
her
when someone does exactly the same thing to you, you go nuts. If
she is
any kind of decent human, she'll be agast at your behavior. Try
it.
I did. And all she said was "Those were all about Kevin....I
thought alt_man said he was not Kevin, so why is he complaining?"
Kevin, did you ever let you family smoke the marijuana you grow or
is it strictly a cash crop?
Are you accusing someone here of growing illegal drugs for resale?

Yes Harry, I am accusing Kevin.
You're lucky he's not litigious.
Ah, your reason for originally asking was so simple to see. You are
an open book and most predictable.

Let me explain it to you Harry one last time.

1. He claims he is not Kevin. My statement was about Kevin.
2. There are hundreds of thousands of Kevin's in the world.

So how could anyone take my statements about Kevin and make a lawsuit
out of them?

Think about it for a while Harry, then get back with me.


Your posts here over the years prove you know nothing about the law.

Fine. I never claimed to be an attorney at law.

Apparently you are so please explain how a lawsuit could be filed for
any reason as a result of the statements made above?


Psst.......Harry......where did you go?


I'm right here, Jim. It's not my job to lead you out of ignorance.




Very Kevinesque.

You really are not too bright, are you fella?