"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Jim Carter wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
The story on what happened keeps changing. And I am not so quick to
believe what "the police" say in the face of statements from
witnesses
who saw something different from what the sky cops said they saw. At
the
very minimum, we need a coroner's inquest.
Isn't that a standard procedure with a shooting in Florida?
If after the inquest a coroner believes a crime may have been
committed, the prosecutor will be informed.
Unbelievable.
Procedures are unbelievable to you?
Figures.



Let me explain it to you slowly Harry. What is unbelievable is that you
want a coroner's inquest in hopes that the coroner finds that a crime may
have been committed and the marshals are put on trial for murder.

The bottom line.........you hope this then hurts GWB.

Yes......Unbelievable.

You are an open book Harry.





Your thinking is as unsound as always. I don't recall bring Presidummy
Bush into this.

I want a coroner's inquest because a man was killed under circumstances
that are unusual, and because there are conflicting witnesses. It is
important to sort these out and determine the truth.

Were these witnesses still on the plane or were they in the jetway where the
event occured?

If it turns out the skycops acted badly, then their training needs to be
changed. Or perhaps their weapons.

Their will be an evaluaiton of the event by the Sky Marshalls and their
training will be updated to reflect the findings of that evaluation of the
event.

Here's a thought: should the skycops be armed with tasers?

No, you don't bring a knife to a gun fight.