"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Jim Carter wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
...by the sky marshals may turn out to be a horrific mistake on their
part.
Too many witnesses are contradicting the marshals' description of the
deceased's on-board behavior.
Hi Harry:, from what I have heard and read on this unfortunate
incident, I
surmise that the Sky Marshal did the correct thing in shooting the man
who
said he had a bomb.

The job of the Sky Marshal is to protect the passengers and the
aircraft.
If they told the man to stop and"get on the ground" and he didn't and
then
he reached into his bag, then the marshal were doing the right thing to
shoot him dead. IMHO......

Jim C.


The story on what happened keeps changing. And I am not so quick to
believe what "the police" say in the face of statements from witnesses
who saw something different from what the sky cops said they saw. At the
very minimum, we need a coroner's inquest.


The coroner cannot prove the actions of the guy while he was on the plane
or while running away from marshals ordering him to stop.

How easy it is to Monday morning quarterback this when you were not there
nor have ever been in a similar situation..........eh Harry?

Do you know what a coroner's inquest is? I thought not.


Explain it to me professor Harry.