John H. wrote:
On 5 Dec 2005 04:51:56 -0800, wrote:


John H. wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 01:10:08 GMT, Gene Kearns
wrote:

....and you care at all about legislative information....this might be
a great information source for you....

http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/fishnews.htm

According to basskisser, NOAA doesn't mess with the water. Now you'e
showing us that they do. How will we ever know who to trust around
here? :)

Uh, dummy, where did I say that "NOAA doesn't mess with the water"? If
you had any clue about comprehension, you'd realize that I was talking
about a SPECIFIC STUDY, dealing with SPECIFIC ITEMS. Of those items,
the only concern for NOAA WAS the atmosphere. But, alas, you've proven
yourself stupid here, so I don't suspect you'll get it.


MERRY CHRISTMAS!

Wishing you peace, fellowship, and good humor as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ on the Christmas Holy Day.

"our" lord? Who are you to force YOUR lord on any and all individuals?

Kevin, go back and read your posts. You stated that NOAA was concerned with the atmosphere, period.
(Or words to that effect.) Surely you remember that. Are you going to make me drag that out here
and show everyone again?

Sorry, John, you're still an idiot. I'm not Kevin. Again, learn to READ
IN CONTEXT.......can you? In order to comprehend anything, you first
must learn that if you take one sentence out of the whole post, it
doesn't mean squat. As I stated previously, I didn't for a moment think
you'd understand that concept.