"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...

"John H." wrote in message
...
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 22:40:19 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


"John H." wrote in message
om...

Harrry, you should have added the fact that you can do nothing but
whine about it, 'cause you, like the rest of the liberals, have no
ideas!

John, I'm a liberal, and I have a plan. I explained it to you and NOYB
over
a year ago. It's absolutely perfect. It's derived from commonly
accepted
methods of discliplining children. Have you forgotten already?


Yup. It must not have overly impressed me, or I didn't see it. Tell me
again, please. But please don't adopt Harry's cut and run attitude,
'cause that won't fly.

--
John

1) Indicate to Muslim-dominant countries that we have a lottery tumbler
filled with balls containing the names of every town in their countries
with a population greater than some number. Let's use 5,000 as a minimum
population. Show a demo of the tumbler on television, being spun by a
scantily clad woman.

2) Any time American property or life is attacked, anywhere, we will
quickly determine if the attack appears to have been conducted by
Islamic wackos. We don't need to know specifically who. One bunch or
another usually claims responsibility. That's how radicals have always
been, regardless of whether they're Irish, Colombian, skinheads,
Italian, SDS, whatever. It's an ego thing.

3) Indicate to the list of governments that if an attack on us takes
place anywhere, we will spin the lottery tumbler, pick a town, and level
it completely. Might take a few days, since there's a limit as to how
much weaponry a jet can carry, but we'll be sure to do a good job. It's
important that the attack begin with seconds of the named ball falling
from the lottery tumbler. No choking one's chicken for 8 months, as your
president did with Iraq.



I proposed a similar scenario a couple of years ago.

Link each US city up with an equal-sized city in a "Muslim-dominant"
country. For example, if NY gets hit (population 8.1 million), buh-bye
to 3/4 of Tehran (population 12 million).

But I favored nukes over conventional weapons. They're cheaper and put
US forces at less risk.

Only stupid people would actually advocate the use of nuclear weapons.

They're cheaper and put US forces at less risk.