Harry,
Kevin was not questioning the theory of a war of attrition. He didn't
understand the basic concept of succession of command.

Let's be honest with each other, don't you find Kevin to be very humorous?
It would be hard to find someone as funny as Kevin if we tried.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:
On 5 Dec 2005 05:16:28 -0800, wrote:

*JimH* wrote:

Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you
understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up
to
take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no
more
leaders left to fill the ranks.

You understand that....eh?
Oh, what a spin!! So, I take it, then, that when you play chess, and
someone takes your Queen, a Rook or a Knight becomes the Queen??

Another who knows nothing of succession of command. In a game of chess,
there are two opposing players. If one gets killed, the other wins. Amen.



Sorry, but Vietnam proved the "war of attrition" techniques don't work.
You were there, right? We lost.


--
Bush-Cheney: Over A Billion Whoppers Served!