"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 16:39:22 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:26:10 -0500, John H. wrote:


What would you suggest, Oh Harry? Should we just roll over and bare
our
stomachs?
Explain to us again, John, what did Iraq have to do with terrorism,
*before* we invaded? Help me out here, John, was it Saddam behind
9/11,
or was it Osama bin Missin'?
What proof do you have that Saddam wasn't harborring terrorists? We
have found, and killed, al-Qaieda members in Iraq since we invaded.
To Bertbrain, this means these terrorists were there before we
invaded.
I suppose there is no IQ test for entree to the marines, eh?
Why denigrate the Marines, Harry. Ten were killed yesterday. Do they
deserve your bull****?

--
John
No, they were serving their country and made the ultimate sacrifice.
Bert deserves whatever he gets for his considerable stupidity. He
"brags" about two things in his life: his peacetime, stateside service
in the reserves and his "huge" salary.



I seem to recall you bragging about your compensation as a senior
executive in 1976 earning $205,000/year (2005 USD's).
No brag. I responded to a question. I never thought it was that much then,
and I don't think it was that much now. I knew plenty of guys in the ad
biz in DC back then who were making far more.

You knew people that made that much but you never made that much or anywhere
near that much.