"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
"Jim--" wrote in message
...
"basskisser" wrote in message
om...
Jim wrote in message
...
http://www.misleader.org/pdf/nyt_ad.pdf

What I like is the fact that BushCo thinks that showing the aftermath
of 911 as perfectly acceptable to help his re-election bid, but they
are trying to ban moveon.org's ads. Me thinks they are scared.

I would guess that the same analogy could therefore be given to Kerry's
use
of his Vietnam experiences in his campaign ads.

Three big differences though.

1. Vietnam happened 30+ years ago, 9-11 less than 4.
2. Kerry was not Commander in Chief during Vietnam, Bush was during
9-11.
3. Being a brave soldier in a war fought 30+ years ago is not a
character
trait needed for the job of POTUS. Successfully leading the Country
through
the 9-11 tragedy and subsequently starting the war on terror are
leadership
traits needed for the job of POTUS.

Where are your cries about Kerry's use of Vietnam video in his ads?

I have no "cries". I do, however, think that a person's military
career should be considered. In response to #3, I DO think that being
a proven leader under the duress of combat is a good quality for the
job. Part 2, Bush's initial reaction was to get to hell out of Dodge.
NOW, what does this have with the initial statement I made, that Bush
thinks it perfectly acceptable to show 9-11 footage, but is trying to
get moveon.org's ads off the air. Why do you think BushCo wants those
ads off of the air? Too much truth to them?

Nope, just the opposite. Too many lies.