"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
news
On Thu, 1 Dec 2005 18:53:46 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:


"Shortwave Sportfishing" wrote in message
. ..
On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 14:58:11 -0600, Q
wrote:

On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 20:11:49 GMT, Shortwave Sportfishing
wrote:

It does not - it never has. Take a image from my site - any one of
them - http://www.swsports.org/images and look at it in Firefox. Then
bring up that same image in Photoshop or Paint Shop Pro - you will see
the difference. IE handles CSS well - Firefox, Opera and others
don't. Otherwise, why would you have to embed data via Photoshop and
PSP to make it display properly on Firefox or Opera?

You got it backwards.

http://www.positioniseverything.net/

Well, I've already admitted that I'm wrong, I'm here in front of God
and everybody that I'm wrong.

Ok? I AM WRONG!!!!

Firefox still sucks. :)

Wrong again Tom.

Twice in one night?

Hey - I'm man enough to admit it.

Something a lot of people around here could practice on occasion I
might add. :)

Later,

Tom


I do not use Firefox. I use IE as that is the standard. As to Firefox and
Unix / derivatives there will always be bugs in them. For years Unix was
written mostly as senior thesis add-on. The Core was AT&T but all the
drivers etc. were add-on. They did not handle error conditions worth crap!
I remember Unix creating thousands of pages of error logs because they could
not handle a disk drive getting off track. This is a sign that the whole
operating system had lots of holes. Admitted error conditions are the
hardest thing to test, but if you need a senior thesis, and the software
works for your thesis advisor, you going to go further? Same thing will be
with Firefox and the Linux operating system. The holes may get patched
faster, but if you think it is immune to virus infection, we have a bridge
to sell you, or some money in Nigeria to transfer to you. Virus's are
written for the 90% of the world using the same operating system. Why write
for the minority?