| 
		
		 
			
posted to rec.boats
	
		 
	 | 
	| 
		
		
		
	 | 
	
	
		
	
		
		
			
			
				 
				 Iraq becomes Texas?
			 
			 
			
		
		
		
			
			
"NOYB"  wrote in message 
  link.net...  
 
 "Doug Kanter"  wrote in message 
 ... 
 
 "NOYB"  wrote in message 
   link.net... 
 
 "Doug Kanter"  wrote in message 
 news 
 
 "Harry Krause"  wrote in message 
 ... 
 Think about it.  Texas-style democracy. 
 
 Pre-invasion, Iraq was a state built on cheap oil and cheap labor, 
 with several classes of citizens, fundamentalists with a gun on every 
 block, paranoia, and a small cadre of graft-fed politicians leading 
 them all. 
 
 Now, that model has been modified by US forces who ousted their 
 leader, Saddam, and replaced him with the Texas model: a state built 
 on cheap oil, cheap labor, several classes of citizens, 
 fundamentalists with a gun on every block, paranoia, and a small cadre 
 of graft-fed politicians leading them all. 
 
 Progress, Republican style. 
 
 
 
 -- 
 January 20th, 2009: Hang in there, America! 
 
 Interesting quote. NOYB will rip this to shreds. 
 
 The military victory of the US-led coalition in March-April 2003 
 resulted in the shutdown of much of the central economic administrative 
 structure. Although a comparatively small amount of capital plant was 
 damaged during the hostilities, looting, insurgent attacks, and 
 sabotage have undermined efforts to rebuild the economy. Despite 
 continuing political uncertainty, the Iraqi Interim Government (IG) has 
 founded the institutions needed to implement economic policy, and has 
 successfully concluded a debt reduction agreement with the Paris Club. 
 The high percentage gain estimated for GDP in 2004 is the result of 
 starting from a low base. 
 
 Please publish the entire quote, or a link to where I can read the 
 entire synopsis so that I can "rip this to shreds"...if it needs 
 ripping.  As it stands, I can't make rhyme or reason out of your snipped 
 passage. 
 
 
 
 Here you go: 
 http://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/...k/geos/iz.html 
 
 Thanks.  Here's the part that jumps out at me: 
 
 "Although a comparatively small amount of capital plant was damaged during 
 the hostilities, looting, insurgent attacks, and sabotage have undermined 
 efforts to rebuild the economy. " 
 
 So initial hostilities caused little damage to "capital plant"...but 
 looting, insurgent activites, and sabotage have hindered a rapid 
 rebuilding of the economy. 
 
 Wouldn't it make sense for the US military to stabilize things, so that 
 insurgent activities and sabotage no longer impede the rebuilding process?
Yes, it would. Got a plan for doing that? If so, please send it he
 
The White House 
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW 
Washington, DC 20500
		  
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
	 |