"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
thunder wrote:
On Thu, 01 Dec 2005 10:04:12 -0500, John H. wrote:


VICTORY IN IRAQ DEFINED
Redefined is more like it. What ever happened to democracy
breaking out
all over the middle east? Quite similar to the WMD mutating to
the WMD
programs, don't you think? So John, when is this administration
going to
stop the BS, and try a little honesty?
It's not defined at all. It's nothing but paragraphs that can be
interpreted any way the misAdministration pleases.
"Longer term, Iraq is peaceful, united, stable, and secure, well
integrated into the international community, and a full partner in
the global war on terrorism."
Wiggle words, especially the way the Bush misAdministration lies.

What does the Administration mean, precisely, by:

peaceful

Does that mean no insurgent attacks? Only 10 a day? What?

united

Now that's an interesting word, since many believe Iraq is going to
divide into two or three nation-states.

stable

Not in anyone's lifetime

secure

What does that mean?

well-integrated

Another wiggle word.

Sorry. Too much room in these phrases for Presidummy Bush to lie as
usual about Iraq.



The key phrase is "full partner in the global war on terrorism".
In other words, Iraq allows us to establish permanent bases in Iraq
from which we can launch attacks against terrorist factions in the
region.
The Iraqis want us out of their country.
You asked them?


They've been asked, more than once. Get your nose out of Faux and
NewsMax.
"Since 1998, Al Qaida has repeatedly cited Vietnam, Beirut, and
Somalia, as examples to encourage more attacks against America and our
interests overseas."



Bush didn't just make this up. From bin Laden's 1996 Declaration of
War on the United States:

"But your most disgraceful case was in Somalia; where- after vigorous
propaganda about the power of the USA and its post cold war leadership
of the new world order- you moved tens of thousands of international
force, including twenty eight thousands American solders into Somalia.
However, when tens of your solders were killed in minor battles and one
American Pilot was dragged in the streets of Mogadishu you left the
area carrying disappointment, humiliation, defeat and your dead with
you. Clinton appeared in front of the whole world threatening and
promising revenge , but these threats were merely a preparation for
withdrawal. You have been disgraced by Allah and you withdrew; the
extent of your impotence and weaknesses became very clear. It was a
pleasure for the "heart" of every Muslim and a remedy to the "chests"
of believing nations to see you defeated in the three Islamic cities of
Beirut , Aden and Mogadishu."



Your second bite of the apple has nothing to do with the fact that
Iraqis have told us they want us out of their country.


Terrorists...espouse the extreme goals of Osama Bin Laden - chaos in Iraq
which will allow them to establish a base for toppling Iraq's neighbors
and launching attacks outside the region and against the U.S. homeland.



Do you not agree with that assessment?

I can site examples from bin Laden's 1996 Fatwa once again if you'd like.



We're obviously not discussing the same issue. Iraqis have been surveyed
by several different organizations, and their opinion is, they want us
out.

Americans have been surveyed too. And almost half think we should cut and
run. That doesn't make them right.

We were the victors in Iraq, so we get set the timetable for our withdrawal.
But I can guarantee you that as long as a Bush is President, we'll always
have troops stationed in bases over there.