"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 09:24:17 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

NOYB wrote:
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
...
"John Gaquin" wrote in message
. ..
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message
news:zz0jf.616
What did the NYT do with the reporters who faked their stories?
They have fired the ones who have been caught at it, as they had no
choice.

Thanks for the information. To summarize, a few reporters did this,
and they were fired.
But folks like Jason Leopold continue to spread misinformation
through other sources. For instance, both jps and Harry jumped on a
Leopold story about the Plame investigation. I guess some folks
never learn.

" Fool me once, shameon - shame on you. Fool me - you can't get
fooled again. "


D'oh. You really don't get it. I don't care about the messenger or the
message, so long as they contribute even indirectly to crippling Bush
even a little so he is less able to destroy America.

Got it now?

You should. I have been very consistent on this. I am in favor of
anything that harms Bush politically.

It's an attribute I learned from the Bush primary campaign of 2000,
when the future presidummy's handlers went after John McCain.
What you can't seem to understand is that your attitude does more to
help Bush
than hinder him. It has become obvious that many Democrat extremists
want *only*
what's 'bad for Bush', regardless of what it does to this country.

With little exception, what is bad for Bush is good for this country.


GI's get killed------bad for the Commander in Chief. Is it good for the
country?

News about prison abuse used as propaganda-----bad for Bush. Good for
the country?

30,000 jobs lost at GM----bad for Bush. Good for the country?

I'm wondering what "exceptions" you're talking about?



GI's get killed...more evidence of Bush's bad judgment
Prison abuses...more evidence of Bush's bad leadership
Layoffs...more evidence of Bush's lack of a plan to re-industrialize
America.

You told me how those things are bad for Bush. You didn't tell me how those
things are good for America.

So I'll ask again:

How is it good for the country if GI's are killed or abuse prisoners?

How is it good if GM lays off 30,000 people?