On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:25:09 +0000, NOYB wrote:


Horsepoop. The charges of Libby stem from the fact that Fitzgerald
believed that Libby was lying when he said that "all the press already
knew about Plame" and that he may have found out about Plame from them.
Since Woodward's testimony corroborates Libby's testimony, it's impossible
for the perjury charges to stick. Fitzgerald's entire timeline blew up in
his face with the Woodward testimony.

Come on, NOYB, we have both read the indictment. That is not the
reasoning behind the charges. And, the timeline *hasn't changed.
Fitzgerald has Libby learning of Plame's status as early as June 11 or 12.
Woodward learned about her status mid-June. Seems to fit quite nicely.