Thread
:
Dee-licious!
View Single Post
#
13
posted to rec.boats
NOYB
Posts: n/a
Dee-licious!
"jps" wrote in message
...
In article . net,
says...
Sorry, but the timeline just doesn't work.
According to Leopold "Rove instructed her (Ralston) not to log a
phone call Rove had with Cooper about Plame in July 2003."
Woodward already testified that he spoke with a government official ("not
Rove") in mid-June. Why would Rove cover-up a conversation about Plame
that
he had with Cooper, if it was already common knowledge among the press
corp
(as Andrea Mitchell admitted to in Oct. 2003...and later recanted) in
mid-June? It simply makes no sense.
Do you have any reason to doubt Woodward when he says that Plame's name
was
mentioned very casually as an off-hand comment from someone other than
Rove
or Libby?
Covering his own ass, just like Karl and Scooter?
Why? He isn't being accused of revealing the name, nor of lying to the
grand jury. So why would he lie about the casualness of his conversation
with a gov't official in June 2003?
Reply With Quote